There is a wrong
impression that the United States
likes the Islamists of the Middle East and North Africa .
This is due to many years of black and red socialist propaganda. The truth is
that the Americans love to have liberals as their allies and partners, and when
they can, they always advise and push their allies to move towards this
direction. I want to describe in which framework the cooperation between the US and
the Saudi Islamists took place in the 20th Century.
Picture 1
At the beginning
of the 20th Century (1900), it was clear how important oil would become
in the 20th Century, since it was going to replace coal and steam
engines. At the beginning of the 20th Century the most industrialized
countries of Europe were England
and Germany , followed by France .
None of them had oil. The only European power that had oil was Russia .
The English, the German and the French could get oil from North Africa and the
Middle East, since the Caspian Sea was controlled by Russia .
After WW2, Germany did not exist as a geopolitical player,
and the conflict was transferred between the West and the Soviet
Union . The Soviets were very rich in oil, but the West controlled
North Africa and the Middle East . However during
the period of 1950-1970, Libya ,
Algeria and Iraq , all came under the control of socialist
dictators who were supported by Russia .
In 1979, with the Islamic revolution, Iran was lost for the West too.
Therefore North Africa and the largest part of the Persian Gulf were lost for
the West, and came under the control of socialist dictators who were aligned
and armed by Russia .
That was a very big change, and a very negative one for the West.
Picture 2
In case of
war the Soviets would have a clear advantage, and during peace the Soviets and
the socialist dictators in North Africa and the Middle
East would act as a cartel, in order to reduce production and
raise oil prices, hurting the American and the European economies. It was Saudi Arabia ,
under American pressure, which would produce more, in order to keep oil prices
low. The other Arabs of the Gulf would do the same, but it is Saudi Arabia which has the huge
reserves.
As a
result, in 1979, after Libya ,
Algeria and Iraq went under socialist control, and after Iran was lost, when the Russians invaded Afghanistan , in order to keep the communist government
in power, the United States
brought forward the Carter Doctrine. The Carter Doctrine was very clear, and it
was saying that the United States
would use military force if the US
interests in the Persian Gulf were undermined.
One has to keep in mind that at the time all the countries of Central Asia i.e.
Kazakhstan , Uzbekistan , Turkmenistan ,
Tajikistan , Kirgistan, were
part of the Soviet Union . Therefore from the
oil rich regions of North Africa, the Caspian Sea and the Middle East, which
hold more than 2/3 of the world’s oil reserves, only the Arabic part of the
Persian Gulf was under Western influence, and that excluded Iraq .
What the
Americans meant with the Carter Doctrine, was that if Saudi Arabia came under Soviet influence, they
would declare war to Russia .
No matter how Saudi Arabia
would come under Russia
influence i.e. with military means or through elections etc. The Carter
Doctrine was clear. The US
would not stand still seeing Saudi
Arabia coming under Soviet control.
Therefore
when we examine the relationship between the Americans and the Saudi Islamists,
we have to take into account that in the Middle East and North
Africa there are only socialist and islamists. There are no
liberals for the Americans to support. Therefore the Americans had to either
support the Islamists, who were enemies with the socialists who were supported
by the Soviets, or let the socialist dictators overturn them, as it happened in
Libya , Algeria , Iraq and many other countries. Do
you thing the Americans really had a choice? Do you think they could do
something else? Without oil you can not switch your car on. Uncle Sam makes
sure that something happens when you turn the key of your car. God bless America .
Wake up silly.
Picture 3
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου